Friday, 28 February 2020   








You are here:
Karen Armstrong: The Label of Catholic Terror Was Never Used About The IRA
Posted by Admin, Senior Editor in News
Topics: Qutb Qutbism Sayyid Qutb Bin Ladin Bin Laden Wahhabi Wahhabis Wahhabism

  Mail To Friend    Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

An excerpt from an article written by Karen Armstrong in the Guardian, Monday July 11 2005.

Last year I attended a conference in the US about security and intelligence in the so-called war on terror and was astonished to hear one of the more belligerent participants, who as far as I could tell had nothing but contempt for religion, strongly argue that as a purely practical expedient, politicians and the media must stop referring to "Muslim terrorism". It was obvious, he said, that the atrocities had nothing to do with Islam, and to suggest otherwise was not merely inaccurate but dangerously counterproductive.

Rhetoric is a powerful weapon in any conflict. We cannot hope to convert Osama Bin Laden from his vicious ideology; our priority must be to stem the flow of young people into organisations such as al-Qaida, instead of alienating them by routinely coupling their religion with immoral violence. Incorrect statements about Islam have convinced too many in the Muslim world that the west is an implacable enemy. Yet, as we found at the conference, it is not easy to find an alternative for referring to this terrorism; however, the attempt can be a salutary exercise that reveals the complexity of what we are up against.

We need a phrase that is more exact than "Islamic terror". These acts may be committed by people who call themselves Muslims, but they violate essential Islamic principles....

... Like the Bible, the Qur'an has its share of aggressive texts, but like all the great religions, its main thrust is towards kindliness and compassion. Islamic law outlaws war against any country in which Muslims are allowed to practice their religion freely, and forbids the use of fire, the destruction of buildings and the killing of innocent civilians in a military campaign. So although Muslims, like Christians or Jews, have all too often failed to live up to their ideals, it is not because of the religion per se.

We rarely, if ever, called the IRA bombings "Catholic" terrorism because we knew enough to realise that this was not essentially a religious campaign. Indeed, like the Irish republican movement, many fundamentalist movements worldwide are simply new forms of nationalism in a highly unorthodox religious guise. This is obviously the case with Zionist fundamentalism in Israel and the fervently patriotic Christian right in the US.

In the Muslim world, too, where the European nationalist ideology has always seemed an alien import, fundamentalisms are often more about a search for social identity and national self-definition than religion. They represent a widespread desire to return to the roots of the culture, before it was invaded and weakened by the colonial powers.

Because it is increasingly recognised that the terrorists in no way represent mainstream Islam, some prefer to call them jihadists, but this is not very satisfactory. Extremists and unscrupulous politicians have purloined the word for their own purposes, but the real meaning of jihad is not "holy war" but "struggle" or "effort." Muslims are commanded to make a massive attempt on all fronts - social, economic, intellectual, ethical and spiritual - to put the will of God into practice.

Sometimes a military effort may be a regrettable necessity in order to defend decent values, but an oft-quoted tradition has the Prophet Muhammad saying after a military victory: "We are coming back from the Lesser jihad [ie the battle] and returning to the Greater Jihad" - the far more important, difficult and momentous struggle to reform our own society and our own hearts.

Jihad is thus a cherished spiritual value that, for most Muslims, has no connection with violence. Last year, at the University of Kentucky, I met a delightful young man called Jihad; his parents had given him that name in the hope that he would become not a holy warrior, but a truly spiritual man who would make the world a better place. The term jihadi terrorism is likely to be offensive, therefore, and will win no hearts or minds.

At our conference in Washington, many people favoured "Wahhabi terrorism". They pointed out that most of the hijackers on September 11 came from Saudi Arabia, where a peculiarly intolerant form of Islam known as wahhabism was the state religion. They argued that this description would be popular with those many Muslims who tended to be hostile to the Saudis. I was not happy, however, because even though the narrow, sometimes bigoted vision of wahhabism makes it a fruitful ground for extremism, the vast majority of wahhabis do not commit acts of terror.

Bin Laden was not inspired by wahhabism but by the writings of the Egyptian ideologue Sayyid Qutb, who was executed by President Nasser in 1966. Almost every fundamentalist movement in Sunni Islam has been strongly influenced by Qutb, so there is a good case for calling the violence that some of his followers commit "Qutbian terrorism." Qutb urged his followers to withdraw from the moral and spiritual barbarism of modern society and fight it to the death.

Western people should learn more about such thinkers as Qutb, and become aware of the many dramatically different shades of opinion in the Muslim world. There are too many lazy, unexamined assumptions about Islam, which tends to be regarded as an amorphous, monolithic entity. Remarks such as "They hate our freedom" may give some a righteous glow, but they are not useful, because they are rarely accompanied by a rigorous analysis of who exactly "they" are.

The story of Qutb is also instructive as a reminder that militant religiosity is often the product of social, economic and political factors. Qutb was imprisoned for 15 years in one of Nasser's vile concentration camps, where he and thousands of other members of the Muslim Brotherhood were subjected to physical and mental torture. He entered the camp as a moderate, but the prison made him a fundamentalist. Modern secularism, as he had experienced it under Nasser, seemed a great evil and a lethal assault on faith.

Precise intelligence is essential in any conflict. It is important to know who our enemies are, but equally crucial to know who they are not. It is even more vital to avoid turning potential friends into foes. By making the disciplined effort to name our enemies correctly, we will learn more about them, and come one step nearer, perhaps, to solving the seemingly intractable and increasingly perilous problems of our divided world.

Source: The Guardian


Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Share or Bookmark this page: You will need to have an account with the selected service in order to post links or bookmark this page.

                 
  
Subscribe via RSS or email:
Follow us through RSS or email. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our feed.

     

Related Articles:
Add a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to comment.






Topics
History
Sects
Beliefs
Shirk (Polytheism)
Refutations
General
News

Latest Articles
Shiite Fatwa for Killing of Sunni Muslims ('Impure Wahhabis') as a Means of Entering Paradise
Sedition Instigator: NImr Al-Nimr Convicted and Executed for Terrorism Offences
A Glimpse Upon Some Core Raafidi Doctrines: The Devil's Deception of the Raafidah Shee'ah
Between Naseer Al-Shirk Al-Toosee and Badr Al-Din Al-Hoothee: Lessons From History
Houthi Shia Criminal Aggression and War Crimes Reported in the Press
Iranian News Agencies Spreading False Propanda Against Students of Dammaaj
What Is the Foundation of the Saying of the Raafidah?
The Shia of Kufah Deceived, Deserted, Ambushed and Murdered the Grandson of the Prophet Al-Husayn, His Brothers and His Children and Took Their Women as Captives
The Shia Believe Revelation Continued After the Messenger and the Saying of Their Imaams Is the Saying of Allaah
The Virtues of Aa'ishah Al-Siddiqah, Daughter of Abu Bakr: Part 3 - A Scholar for the Companions

Pages
No pages found.

Most Popular
Understanding and Classifying the Various Shia Sects
The Shia of Kufah Deceived, Deserted, Ambushed and Murdered the Grandson of the Prophet Al-Husayn, His Brothers and His Children and Took Their Women as Captives
A Revealing Glimpse at the Doctrines of the Nusayriyyah (Alawi) Sect
Ayat Al-Shaytan Khomeini: Seeking Aid From the Dead (And Stones and Mud) Is Not Shirk
Uncovering the Hidden Realities of Hizbollah: Part 4 - Iranian Rafidi Shia Proxies in Other Lands - Saudi Arabia
The Ahl Al-Bayt Were Harmed, Grieved and Also Killed by the Shia of Al-Kufah
Kuwaiti Rafidi Yasir Al-Habib: Celebrating the Death of Aa'ishah Al-Siddiqah
Uncovering the Hidden Realities of Hizbollah: Part 5 - The Hoothees in Yemen
The Virtues of Abu Bakr Al-Siddeeq: Part 2 - Abu Bakr in The Quran
Affirmation From Shia Source Books That Abdullah Bin Saba' Is the Original Founder of Rafidi Shia Doctrines

Archives (View more)
2016 • January
2013 • November
2012 • September
2011 • September


Copyright © 2020 . All rights reserved. RSSTagsPrivacyLegal and Terms of UseSitemap